Re: [cryptography] really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors? (Re: Auditable CAs)
I will cease forwarding this thread as it just increases
the local noise. Anyone who's interested can subscribe to the list
directly.
Feel free to point me towards other relevant lists, I will subscribe
there and digest relevant threads to here.
----- Forwarded message from Ondrej Mikle
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 11:47 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I will cease forwarding this thread as it just increases the local noise. Anyone who's interested can subscribe to the list directly.
Feel free to point me towards other relevant lists, I will subscribe there and digest relevant threads to here.
What's your impression of the proportion of emails that aren't interesting to emails that are interesting but not worth forwarding to emails that are worth forwarding? I've been burned in the past by subscribing to lists that previously you had been a good filter for, so I'd like to make sure this time. It would be FANTASTIC to have records for forwarded emails/all emails for the lists you forward to other lists. That would be interesting. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
What's your impression of the proportion of emails that aren't interesting to emails that are interesting but not worth forwarding to emails that are worth forwarding?
I've been burned in the past by subscribing to lists that previously you had been a good filter for, so I'd like to make sure this time.
Interesting for me is probably around 65%. You can judge for yourself: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.cryptography.randombit I like it, but to be honest, it does get spouts of super-high volume (like the last week while I was traveling). I consume it via RSS from gmane which keeps my inbox cleaner. -tom
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 03:10:36PM -0500, Ted Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 11:47 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I will cease forwarding this thread as it just increases the local noise. Anyone who's interested can subscribe to the list directly.
Feel free to point me towards other relevant lists, I will subscribe there and digest relevant threads to here.
What's your impression of the proportion of emails that aren't interesting to emails that are interesting but not worth forwarding to emails that are worth forwarding?
Cryptograhy@ is definitely worth subscribing to for a cypherpunk.
I've been burned in the past by subscribing to lists that previously you had been a good filter for, so I'd like to make sure this time.
I'm glad you find it useful.
It would be FANTASTIC to have records for forwarded emails/all emails for the lists you forward to other lists. That would be interesting.
I have a number of sorting buckets I dump stuff worth saving for future reference http://postbiota.org/pipermail/ E.g. info has some cpunkly relevance, but not too much: http://postbiota.org/pipermail/info/ tt is even more tenuous: http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/ (RSS feed: http://postbiota.org/pipermail/list.rss ) -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
participants (3)
-
Eugen Leitl -
Ted Smith -
Tom Ritter