Your message has been rejected and is being returned because it appears to be a reply to an alias that is designed for one-way communication only. You should reply only to the sender of a message sent to one-way aliases. If you wish to complain about abuse of a one-way alias, you should send E-mail to the postmaster of your domain. For example, postmaster@Eng. If your E-mail was addressed to more than one alias protected by this filter then you will get a copy of this message for each protected alias. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration, -- Postmaster P.S. This is an automatically generated message. -----------------Begin Returned Message------------------- Your message has been rejected and is being returned because it appears to be a reply to an alias that is designed for one-way communication only. You should reply only to the sender of a message sent to one-way aliases. If you wish to complain about abuse of a one-way alias, you should send E-mail to the postmaster of your domain. For example, postmaster@Eng. If your E-mail was addressed to more than one alias protected by this filter then you will get a copy of this message for each protected alias. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration, -- Postmaster P.S. This is an automatically generated message. -----------------Begin Returned Message------------------- Your message has been rejected and is being returned because it appears to be a reply to an alias that is designed for one-way communication only. You should reply only to the sender of a message sent to one-way aliases. If you wish to complain about abuse of a one-way alias, you should send E-mail to the postmaster of your domain. For example, postmaster@Eng. If your E-mail was addressed to more than one alias protected by this filter then you will get a copy of this message for each protected alias. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration, -- Postmaster P.S. This is an automatically generated message. -----------------Begin Returned Message------------------- At 4:44 AM +0000 9/12/00, Michael Shields wrote:

In article <a0431010cb5e346ed8216@[207.111.241.215]>, Tim May <tcmay@got.net> wrote:

...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/13169.html

"Here's something to think about - while queuing up for petrol this afternoon (yes - I confess to being a panic buyer) I worked out that OPEC is charging $30 a barrel and our government is taxing us at slightly over $150 a barrel - ouch!"

$30 (now $35) is the price of a barrel of *light sweet crude*, not the price of a barrel of refined gasoline. -- Shields.

The quote said nothing to the contrary. Crude results in some fraction of gasoline/petrol, and taxes are applied. His point was that the taxes are about 4-5 times the cost of the underlying petrol, which is about what it is in the U.K. (Last I heard, gas in the U.K. is about the equivalent of about $4-5 a gallon for unleaded regular.) --Tim May -- ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, "Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.