Bugs in the belfry
<http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2004/11/28/bugs_in_the_belfry?mode=PF> The Boston Globe THE EXAMINED LIFE Bugs in the belfry By Joshua Glenn, Globe Staff | November 28, 2004 FOR OVER a century, philosophers and literary scholars have debated whether or not the apocalyptic, sometimes megalomaniacal qualities of the final books written by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche can be chalked up to the gradually unfolding delusions and personality disturbances of the author's paresis (tertiary syphilis). In the current issue of Daedalus, the journal of the Cambridge-based American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the distinguished UMass-Amherst geobiologist Lynn Margulis announces that the answer to this longstanding riddle has been discovered floating in a Cape Cod pond. To recap: In 1888, a sickly Nietzsche wrote the tracts "Twilight of the Idols," "The Antichrist," "Ecce Homo," and "The Case of Wagner" in a burst of productivity. But the following January in Turin, he flung his arms around the neck of a horse being flogged, collapsed in the piazza, and swiftly descended into a raving dementia brought on -- as records of a young Nietzsche's treatment for syphilis 30 years earlier would appear to indicate -- by paresis. So was Nietzsche suffering, as many have argued, from incipient paresis when he wrote "Twilight of the Idols," et al? If so, then (the argument goes) these late books, brilliant as they may appear to be, can't be taken as seriously as his earlier, saner writing. Or did the philosopher go mad from some other cause all of a sudden, in the space of a single day, as others prefer to believe? That's where Margulis, an expert in microorganisms who has no reputation as a Nietzsche scholar, comes in -- to say "neither." After explaining that syphilis is a syndrome caused by the ravages of the spirochete Treponema pallidum (the lively, corkscrew-shaped bacterium pictured at right), Margulis elaborates on her own recent research into spirochetes by weighing in on the long-running debate over Nietzsche's brain. Yes, Nietzsche's madness was undoubtedly caused by paresis, she writes -- but he most likely went crazy quite suddenly, as opposed to over the course of weeks and months. "Nietzsche's brain on January 3, 1889 experienced a transformation," she states -- which means that his books of 1888 weren't written by a delusional kook. But is it possible for paresis to appear overnight, instead of slowly? Margulis believes it is, and as evidence points to studies of microbial mat samples taken from Eel Pond in Woods Hole and kept in a jar in a UMass-Amherst lab. Although no typical spirochetes were found in these samples, Margulis recounts, when food and water known to support spirochete activity were added to some samples, spirochetes that could only have been been lying dormant suddenly awoke from their slumber. Extrapolating from these experiments, Margulis argues that inactive Treponema pallidum spirochetes had been hiding out in Nietzsche's tissues ever since his syphilis treatment some 30 years earlier." But on January 3, 1889 in Turin," Margulis concludes, channeling Vincent Price, "armies of revived spirochetes munched on his brain tissue. The consequence was the descent of Nietzsche the genius into Nietzsche the madman in less than one day." ? ) Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
At 07:49 AM 12/8/2004, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
So was Nietzsche suffering, as many have argued, from incipient paresis when he wrote "Twilight of the Idols," et al? If so, then (the argument goes) these late books, brilliant as they may appear to be, can't be taken as seriously as his earlier, saner writing. Or did the philosopher go mad from some other cause all of a sudden, in the space of a single day, as others prefer to believe?
If you're a literary-crit type, interested in the evolution of Nietzsche's thought, that's an interesting kind of question, and you can go looking for evidence in the changes in ideas and expression between his earlier and later books. However, if you're trying to examine the question of whether his books should be taken seriously as philosophy, as opposed to whether they're Significant Art, then that doesn't really matter; the question is whether the ideas as written are any good or are crackpot lunacy, which is independent of whether the author was a crackpot. I suppose if you're trying to evaluate whether they're a good philosophy for actual living, you can look at the effects of Nietzsche's ideas on his life, but that's a much broader study, and the direct lesson here is that unsafe sex isn't a good idea.. Disclaimer - most of what I've read of Nietzsche was when we had to translate some of it in high school German class. It's very frustrating to be reading something that appears to say that the destruction of the human race would be a good thing and have to figure out if that's because you got a verb tense wrong or because it's Nietzsche. ---- Bill Stewart bill.stewart@pobox.com
participants (2)
-
Bill Stewart
-
R.A. Hettinga