You missed the irony, I guess I should have put in the irony-smiley. Given the overall context of the bill, the debate on the floor, and it's conclusion your report is shrill and Chicken-littleish, which does nothing for creating credible support of resistance to eroding civil liberty. Do your job, support your position, and do it clearly please. Right now I have no patience for Wired-generation smugness.

...

circumstances, that this amendment allows cybertapping under, for

On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:11:53PM -0700, citizenQ wrote: > Please indicate the wider circumstances, particularly the warrantless those of us without your time or acumen in editing the existing Title III language.

To achieve enlightement, you must consider how this bill amends existing wiretap law. This will take some time, it is true, but it is The Path.

-Declan