RE: Seth Finkelstein, reluctant cypherpunk?
So, do the participants of this list wish to actually get something done with regard to securing privacy, or shall we just spin our wheels in internecine warfare?
I, a long-time Cypherpunk Movement member known as "anonymous", share this sentiment. Cypherpunks deal with technology in the first place. Our goal is spreading crypto literacy, seeding the sheeple (god, I feel divine) with means to immunize itself from the Watchers. It is completely irrelevant how many government-sponsored agents circulate among us. Assume that the number is 25%. Or 5. Or whatever. Who cares ? As long as we stick to the technology all feds can do are these pesky subpoenas. And speaking of technology and education, I wonder WHAT DOES IT TAKE to organise free crypto classes in the Bay Area ? I can donate time and some money. I know 2 others who are willing to do the same. We need at least 3-4 more volunteers. I am specifically not interested in Mr. May's views on this - solitary masturbation is so boring.
participants (1)
-
An Metet