[OT] why was private gold ownership made illegal in the US?
-- On 3 Jul 2002 at 2:36, Anonymous wrote:
At the time, the U.S. faced a significant chance of a Communist/Socialist revolution such as had been seen in several other countries. Class warfare was widespread,
The high point of support for socialism among the masses in the US was the 1870s, give or take a couple of decades. By 1900 socialists around the world had given up all hope of genuinely revolutionary seizure of power, and were pursuing conspiratorial paths. The 1930s was the high point of support for socialism among the intellectuals, the privileged, and the elite. Their efforts to foist their preferences on the American masses met with resounding hostility and reluctance. Not only was there no danger of a socialist revolution, in the US or anywhere else, but in the US the leadership's attempts to force socialism down peoples throats met stubborn resistance. There was more mass support for socialism in other countries, but no socialist revolutions in those countries, nor any danger of such revolt. There were socialist coups, and conspiratorial seizures of power by socialists in other countries. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG 3x+jv+MnH33X3HSDdYMeLIgT55+H4ekUhpOMDJDS 2vKGDwf7SNzlVqX8Hi5qcbp51h1c6SSx0sz6gRDeI
Socialism in the US, and elsewhere, transmogrified into other movements which adopted some of its aspects and mixed them with other social and political intentions. To be sure, socialism was such a mongrel itself, as was and is, capitalism. Hardly a political ideology is not an opportunistic blend of what will work, and which will evolve in a winning direction, hopefully. Capitalism is infused with socialist benefits for its practitioners, and democratic socialism pervasive in Europe is infused with luxurious elitism which favors those who enjoy heirarchies. Anti-political ideologies are about the only schemes which do not hide what they are made of, have stolen from, deny they are, all the while reaping rewards that come with dissimulation. Even anarchy as most often practiced benefits mostly its promulgators at the expense of their followers -- yes, anarchists are composed of dues-stealing leaders and dunned followers no matter what its ideolgues preach. A most pernicious ideology is that of individualism, particularly the "rugged" version, in which person espouses a rejection of all ideology while gobbling among the garbage heap of ideology for bits and pieces to confect a seemingly unique brew of convictions which when examined shows nothing more than what ignorance can engender in the way of mongrelism triumphant. Sometimes, praise allah, ignorance does surpass wisdom in weeding out incestous ideologies, so contaminated by each other's liftings and copyings and prevarications that they are hulks without substance, and instead of these skins of shallowest appearance grow a novel set of ideas which fit the times, for a brief period at least. Those who follow these novelties are considered mad by the main street phlegmatics who may insist the sheriff kill the terrifying varmints, and the sheriff may do that provided deputies sent to do the pesticide are not members of the rebellion always bubbling beneath the appearance of law and order.
participants (2)
-
James A. Donald
-
John Young