I'm sure everyone has seen this. http://cryptome.org/jones-v-cat.htm And I know how I dislike raw links so I won't do it. The Honorable Edith Jones has a VERY healthy attitude towards electronic snooping. IMHO she's outraged. Is the Washington-mandated snooping part of a power play where the behavior of the judiciary needs to be monitored and controlled in real-time or is it incidental to the stated goals of cleaning up office computer usage? Now I wonder how Judge Jones feels about snooping on the population in general? Is she a standout among judges or do those in power feel outrage only when the abuse is close to home? Do those in power want to create the virtual version of gated communities and limit the membership or all entitled to the same rights? Mike