At 05:53 PM 9/14/00 -0400, L. Sassaman wrote:

I don't enjoy the fact that some people are being harassed through my remailer. But I cannot prevent that without limiting the effectiveness of the remailer.

Have there been any court rulings that define the level of liability for remops whose remailers are used to facilitate criminal actions?

Is someone like myself, running a public remailer, considered an ISP? (I'm thinking of the Prodigy ruling, where Prodigy was deemed not responsible for content posted on its BBS system.)

Shouldn't your remailer include 1. mention of what it is 2. how to exclude an address from being a destination? It has not yet reached the supremes, nor do I imagine you want to fund that path. We can only hope your upstreams have as much backbone as you.