If any were looking for a replacement for napster since it buckled to pressure from RIAA, it's here: morpheus. It's distributed like gnutella, but it scales, it has fast searches, downloads work, and are not sensitive to individual machines being switched off mid download. It tries to download from network topologically close machines. (It downloads from multiple machines at once to speed up download, and so that one machine can go down without losing the download). The architecture is a self organising network which promotes some peers to being super-nodes based on their bandwidth. Super-nodes act as search hubs, which avoids the gnutella melt-down which arises due to their broadcast searches. I've been informally plotting the growth of morpheus for the last 3 weeks, and I figure it stands a fair chance of reaching 1 peta byte (1000 Terabytes) in storage by the end of this month. Last seen with 600,000 simultaneous users sharing 50 million files and 300 Tb of data. windows only but worth rebooting into windows for. on a side note napster deservd to die -- it's like evolution for file sharing networks. It's central point of failure and central server involvement in searches made it too vulnerable to legal attack. Gnutella wasn't but didn't scale, morpheus appears to be scaling and if anything performance is improving as the data density gets higher so the sharing surface can give you the content you want from closer and closer nodes. There may be an inflection point where it starts to really take off as the number of users is still improving the usability, performance and variety of content. Adam
On 3 Aug 2001, at 11:33, Adam Back wrote:
If any were looking for a replacement for napster since it buckled to pressure from RIAA, it's here: morpheus.
[review deleted]
Adam
Some questions that would be of relevance duscussing file-sharing systems on this group: is it adware/spyware? Is the source available? If not, do they at least make the communication protocol open so you could build your own client if you wanted to? George
In article <3B6A89DA.30274.A4DCA1@localhost>, <georgemw@speakeasy.net> wrote:
is it adware/spyware?
Yes. Adware. Its cousin KaZaA (uses the same network) is spyware. [Well, we don't know that for sure. But it installs apparently ~5 different "phone home and get data" apps on your system.]
Is the source available?
No.
If not, do they at least make the communication protocol open so you could build your own client if you wanted to?
No. But of course, that's never stopped us before... - Ian
Ian wrote about Morpheus, quoting georgemw@speakeasy.net:
If not, do they at least make the communication protocol open so you could build your own client if you wanted to?
No.
But of course, that's never stopped us before...
Hmm, their specs claim "Fully encrypted to protect privacy, transmissions and unauthorized intrusions". http://musiccity.com/en/frameset_web_fl_teal.html [Though even a file sharing system with broken crypto might make a suitable component of a larger, secure, system. I have never used Morpheus and have no opinion on the system's suitability to task]. --Lucky
In article <3B6A89DA.30274.A4DCA1@localhost>, <georgemw@speakeasy.net> wrote:
is it adware/spyware?
Yes. Adware. Its cousin KaZaA (uses the same network) is spyware. [Well, we don't know that for sure. But it installs apparently ~5 different "phone home and get data" apps on your system.]
Is the source available?
No.
If not, do they at least make the communication protocol open so you could build your own client if you wanted to?
No. But of course, that's never stopped us before... - Ian
participants (4)
-
Adam Back
-
georgemw@speakeasy.net
-
iang@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu
-
Lucky Green