RE: RSA performance on Athlon64 vs. Itanium
"Lucky Green" <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> writes:
I since ran additional tests. All tests are for 1024-bit RSA signatures.
Taking some guesses here at the code being used:
1) OpenSSL as shipping with the RedHat Taroon beta for Athlon 64:
921 RSA signatures/second
x86-32 hand-tuned asm optimised for Pentium Pro.
2) OpenSSL compiled manually:
1313 RSA signatures/second
x86-64 code, gcc optimised for Athlon64.
3) Performance benchmark application made available to reviewers:
Exceeding 3800 RSA signatures/second.
x86-64 hand-tuned asm optimised for Athlon64. I'm guessing this one has the same catch as the Itanium speed test.
I am getting ready to buy a second one to upgrade my other box at home.
My PoS hardware test PC and a $25 Broadcom chip beats your Athlon 64 :-). Peter.
participants (1)
-
pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz