Harry Shapiro said he wasn't able to find much information on Mykotronx. The San Francisco Chronicle says it's a "little-known company in Torrance, CA"; "Mykotronx Inc., founded in 1979 by two former engineers from TRW Inc., already sells classified encryption chips to protect satellite communications." "San Jose-based VLSI Research Inc. will manufacture the chip, called the Clipper. VLSI was chosen largely because it has a unique manufacturing process that makes it nearly impossible to take the chip apart and decode it." The Washington Times says that "Government engineers at NSA and [...] NIST designed and developed the chip, which was then produced by privately owned Mykotronx and a publicly traded subcontractor, VLSI Technology." In their discussion of comments by Ted Bettwy, exec VP of Mykotronx, "He said the chip announced yesterday, internally referred to as MYK-78, costs about $40 and uses an algorithm 16 million times more complex than that used by chips now on the market. Computer hackers have penetrated the current chips." Bill Stewart
the vp from mycotoxin spoke, and some reporter said: "He said the chip announced yesterday, internally referred to as MYK-78, costs about $40 and uses an algorithm 16 million times more complex than that used by chips now on the market. Computer hackers have penetrated the current chips." 16 M is approx 2^24 80 bit wiretap chip key - 56 bit DES key = 24 Just because the key is 24 bits longer doesn't mean the chips are that much more complex. Biham and Shamir have reduced the security of DES down to 2^47 (maybe down a few more in the exponent), but that does not mean that it has been broken. 2^47 chosen plaintexts is not a feasible attack in a reasonably deployed system. This is the best known attack. Biham and Shamir are not computer hackers, either. So assuming the reporter was basically accurate, what's the score for our VP? One deceit and one outright lie combined with a gratuitous slander. Eric
participants (2)
-
Eric Hughes
-
wcs@anchor.ho.att.com