CDR: Re: police IR searches to Supremes
27 Sep
2000
27 Sep
'00
6:55 p.m.
At 06:52 AM 9/27/00 -0400, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
Well, I think that as long as a conventional photograph is taken from a public place, it does not constitute a punishable breach of privacy. What's so very different about doing the same thing with IR?
So if you use a different wavelength you can image people through walls. That should be useful for determining who is committing illegal sexual acts under cover of optically opaque walls. Its just a different wavelength, after all.
8853
Age (days ago)
8853
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
David Honig