I expressed my displeasure over PKP/RSA's apparent support for Clipper/ Capstone/Key Escrow to RSA's head, Jim Bidzos. Here's his reply. Quoth Jim Bidzos, verily I saith unto thee:
From jim@RSA.COM Wed Jun 16 13:03:04 1993 id <AA05248>; Wed, 16 Jun 1993 13:03:01 -0600 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 93 12:01:09 PDT From: jim@RSA.COM (Jim Bidzos) Message-Id: <9306161901.AA16476@RSA.COM> To: anton@hydra.unm.edu In-Reply-To: Stanton McCandlish's message of Sun, 13 Jun 1993 23:01:03 -0600 (MDT) <9306140501.AA13212@hydra.unm.edu> Subject: hmph
RSA/PKP supporting Clipper? Where did you hear that? (It's untrue.) For a year and a half, we have been claiming that DSS is covered by patents we hold. NIST has finally stopped fighting, and asked for licensing terms. We provided them. Hardly "support for Clipper."
--Jim
-- Stanton McCandlish * Space Migration * Networking * ChaOrder * NO GOV'T. * anton@hydra.unm.edu * Intelligence Increase * Nano * Crypto * NO RELIGION * FidoNet: 1:301/2 * Life Extension * Ethics * VR * Now! * NO MORE LIES! * Noise in the Void BBS * +1-505-246-8515 (24hr, 1200-14400, v32bis, N-8-1) *
RSA/PKP supporting Clipper? Where did you hear that? (It's untrue.)
Quote this paragraph: PKP will also grant a license to practice key management, at no additional fee, for the integrated circuits which will implement both the DSA and the anticipated Federal Information Processing Standard for the "key escrow" system announced by President Clinton on April 16, 1993. I'm not going to respond directly to him, since I don't know if you want him to know you reforwarded his mail. However, I would make the argument that if RSA really didn't want the clipper chip, they would license it to NIST in such a way that "all implementations based on our patents will be made available in software source form for non-commercial use". I'm sure legal language can be constructed which would prohibit hardware-only implementations. I couldn't write it though. Marc
participants (2)
-
Marc Horowitz -
Stanton McCandlish