This is another message on the Cancel Message Generator issue in news.admin.policy. In article <C3tzrs.5t5@redpoll.neoucom.edu> Richard Depew <red@redpoll.neoucom.edu writes:

As I promised yesterday, I emailed each recent anonomous poster in the "sci" hierarchy a note explaining what may happen this weekend.

Dick =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dear anonymous poster,

You may not be aware of the discussion in news.admin.policy concerning the propriety of posting anonymously to newsgroups which have not invited such postings. As someone who has posted anonymously to the "sci" hierarchy recently, you should read it.

I am writing to inform you that if Julf, admin@anon.penet.fi, does not soon block anonymous postings to the "sci" hierarchy, then I will activate an "Automated Retroactive Minimal Moderation" script that will cancel postings to this hierarchy from his server. This is intended to restore the pre-Julf status quo, at least temporarily, over the weekend.

Rest assured that there is nothing personal in this. I have not read your postings, and I have no reason to believe that they were out of line in any way other than being anonymous. I have nothing against anonymous postings to groups that have decided to accept such postings, nor do I object to any newsgroup deciding to do this. I *do* object to Julf's permitting his server to post to newsgroups without any effort to determine whether the readers of those newsgroups want to permit anonymous postings.

You have several possible courses of action if you wish to post to the "sci" hierarchy while the "Automated Retroactive Minimal Moderation" is in effect:

*1 convince Julf to accept the "Petersen Proposal" for default settings for different hierarchies. I promise to turn off the ARMM script as soon as I hear that he will do this (or anything reasonably responsive).

*2 convince the readers of the newsgroup to which you want to post that anonymous postings should be accepted in that newsgroup. I can think of several valid reasons that may prompt such a desire, but the decision should be made by the readers of the newsgroup, not imposed by a single person such as Julf, or me. I promise to abide by whatever decision the newsgroup makes. This does not need to be a formal vote. A straw vote with a clear majority will suffice.

*3 have a friend post for you, use a different anonymous server, or, if all else fails, post under your own name. People used to do this, you know. :-)

If none of these suit you, then simply be patient, and wait until Monday. I intend to run ARMM, if I run it at all, for less than 48 hours... this time. This is merely intended to be a demonstration that an effective enforcement mechanism for blocking postings from a particular site can work.

I apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you. My argument is with Julf and is about the default setting for entire hierarchies; it is not with you or your particular postings.

Sincerely, Dick Depew =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -- Richard E. Depew, Munroe Falls, OH red@redpoll.neoucom.edu "Leap years are a pain; the earth should be stabilised." - Geoff Collyer and Mark Moraes in getabsdate.3