-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - ----- Original Message -----
The wired-generation issue is that we don't need glib knowitall half-information or reporting that's packaged just like an SUV ad except it's for the socalled digiscenti. The issue is that we need
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:06:59PM -0700, citizenq@hushmail.com wrote: the best information that we can get and Declan's superficial reportage of the Congressional debate does NOT fulfill the need.
Fool.
"Doesn't take criticism well." I linked to the transcript and posted the text of the bill myself.
I offered in-depth coverage. Compare and contrast to wire coverage of the same legislation to achieve enlightenment.
Is this where you set the bar when lives are on on the line? You post a link, post some text and then proclaim the sky is falling, or this thing or another thing, without analysis? My point is you have to do better. "Doesn't perform according to his potential." Never mind I'll do it myself.
-Declan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Hush 2.0 wl0EARECAB0FAjulXccWHGNpdGl6ZW5xQGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDXa6sbPNqxenjU AKCs4vA+5hO1umSZnobSvs5U4SRODgCeNWLHwNSgNBH4UK6fwK+/gLqqbLU= =9cAj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Unfortunately for "citizenq"'s tender sensibilities, sometimes it actually makes sense to call a fool a fool. This is one of those times. "citizenq" clearly does not understand the difference between a news article written by the general public that does not permit line-by-line analysis of the bill and more technical commentary that it suitable for other fora. I did write a detailed description of the bill for Politech, where such an analysis is appropriate: http://www.politechbot.com/p-02518.html "citizenq" has proven itself someone who needs killfiling. -Declan At 09:08 PM 9/16/01 +0000, citizenq@hushmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- ----- Original Message -----
The wired-generation issue is that we don't need glib knowitall half-information or reporting that's packaged just like an SUV ad except it's for the socalled digiscenti. The issue is that we need
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:06:59PM -0700, citizenq@hushmail.com wrote: the best information that we can get and Declan's superficial reportage of the Congressional debate does NOT fulfill the need.
Fool.
"Doesn't take criticism well."
I linked to the transcript and posted the text of the bill myself.
I offered in-depth coverage. Compare and contrast to wire coverage of the same legislation to achieve enlightenment.
Is this where you set the bar when lives are on on the line? You post a link, post some text and then proclaim the sky is falling, or this thing or another thing, without analysis? My point is you have to do better.
"Doesn't perform according to his potential."
Never mind I'll do it myself.
-Declan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Hush 2.0
wl0EARECAB0FAjulXccWHGNpdGl6ZW5xQGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDXa6sbPNqxenjU AKCs4vA+5hO1umSZnobSvs5U4SRODgCeNWLHwNSgNBH4UK6fwK+/gLqqbLU= =9cAj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
citizenq＠hushmail.com -
Declan McCullagh