Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet?
I sure hope so. ----- Forwarded message from bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com -----
Indeed, the use of rogue and banal programs and technology to conceal novel penetrations and takeovers or covertly aid their success is venerable subterfuge. Most of them taught at Ft Huachuca to the Bradley Mannings and deployled by hotshit newbies at Cyberwarcom. Beta tested in the wild, say like the Lady Gaga download stratgem. Some go haywire and escape control or have unintended consequences like Morris's worm. Shh, national security at stake. Bizarre and comical behavior to hide the diabolical and malign. Jesters and courtesans and priests and housekeepers and grunts were always the best insider spies and spreaders of undermining disinfo, and SDT mental and corporeal. Disengineering strong crypto, a variation on stuxnetting. A bit of code inserted on PGP servers or PGP users via key verification. Weak attacks to assay powerful defenses. SOP in the military to boost budgets way beyond need. Covertly clouding illicit archives and snoops on systems of clueless users of Skype, IM, social media, any commercial or Internet operational software. Backflowing program updates used to plant snoopers on the updater systems. Prepositioned tick-tickers at IANA, CERT, Cyberwarcom, IRS, eop.gov and vatican.org. Thanks to Tesla, no thanks to Edison who kept it quiet, anything electromagnetic can be taken over, especially those which foolishly aim for asymmetrical control. Following Tesla's roguosity, the Internet is a vast reverse spying machine, with bountiful EM inititative hiding places beneath those listed handily by those who warn only of threats they want to sell protection for and try like hell to dismiss the others as amateurish. You try to patent any of these, it will be classified upon receipt. Look, it would be appreciated if you didn't put this on the Internet.
participants (2)
-
Eugen Leitl
-
John Young