nate@VIS.ColoState.EDU (CVL staff member Nate Sammons) writes:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[useful content deleted]

+-------------------------------------------------------------------- | Nate Sammons email: nate@VIS.ColoState.Edu | Colorado State University Computer Visualization Laboratory | Finger me at nate@monet.VIS.ColoState.Edu for my PGP key | #include <std.disclaimer> | "I have but one single desire - to tear down the sky" -A. Toomba +----------------------+

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3

iQCVAgUBLDxY0tTgi1fmrpxlAQH8ZgP7BHGGnAP2MGLg0pbhJ8HpgU/1t6Ai+ln5 xzpcsvbG4cJwhKBrX5luVLGmdHSZxdZ3kyv4+G6ypcIb5MZMpiPzbGH7z2kuRc4y XlHBwrjOlbZDcyupJJUzSi8LuoQmXVu+M1r7EAkiK7JOMgljyOQ//E5ctJbt3qHl 8eA0uJGQFqs= =4oo0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

This is my first post here, so go easy if I'm way off base. Why would you want to include a PGP signature (in addition to your net .signature) for a message that is NOT encoded? I've included the pageful of useless text from your message as an example of how wasteful this seems to me. I'm all for personal privacy and message security, but this smacks of either paranoia, showing off, or laziness. Genuinely curious. /\/\ Morgan Davis Group (619/670-0563) / /__\ Internet: mdavis@pro-sol.cts.com