"running gambling operations while declaring gambling immoral and illegal is clearly nonsensical and (I think) unconstitutional" Not to mention the CIA running crack into inner-city neighborhoods and tipping off the local dealers prior to a big DEA bust, all the while declaring all things non-Alchohol to be "drugs", and illegal/immoral. -TD

From: Tim May <timcmay@got.net> To: cypherpunks@lne.com Subject: Re: Underestimating long-term consequences of cryptoanarchy Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 22:00:25 -0700

On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 03:08 PM, John Kelsey wrote:

...

At 10:03 AM 5/10/03 -0700, Tim May wrote: [Talking about government-assisted projects and businesses going broke]

...

Which is all evolution in action, except that government should not be in the construction and business development business. (I would go further and say that nothing in the U.S. Constitution, which states and localities are bound by, justifies taking money from citizens to give to businesses. No matter "how smart an investment" it looks to be. Ditto for governments running gambling operations, but I >> digress.)

It's very clear that this is bad policy, though I'm not too sure it's actually unconstitutional. Didn't the states finance and run some of the early canals?

The states also established state religions and banned books, in the century or so for it to shake out in the Supreme Court that when the states agreed to support the Constitution as a condition for joining the Union it meant that they really did have to support the Constitution.

The Bill of Rights is quite clear that powers not specifically granted to government by the Constitution don't exist.

While building canals is arguably related to national defense and the common good (though I think private actors are better suited to build canals, and railroads, etc.), running gambling operations while declaring gambling immoral and illegal is clearly nonsensical and (I think) unconstitutional. Regrettably, the political stooges who sit on the Supreme Court have put considering this business of government running gambling dens about #131 on the list of probably unconstitutional things to look at.

(I think the courts should hold personally liable those who pass unconstitutional measures. Imprisoning those who commit acts later declared to be unconstitutional might disincentivize them to blithely pass unconstitutional bills.)

To repeat, government cannot declare gambling a social evil which must be banned and then turn around and set up its own gambling operations.

Everyone involved in the many state gambling operations should receive sentences no less harsh than those imprisoned on gambling charges. This would mean most would die in prison. Except for those who ought to be killed for their other substantial crimes, this would be a good thing.

"I was just following orders" is, of course, not a defense. The lowliest lottery clerk should receive the same multi-year prison sentence that a Mob numbers runner would receive.

The kingpins in the Republicrat parties will, of course, receive effective death sentences, gang-raped by the lifers they sent to prison for competing with the JFL/LBJ/Nixon/Ollie North/Bill Clinton/Mena, Arkansas drug pipeline set up decades ago by corrupt-on-earth Washington politicians like John F. Kennedy. At least he got whacked.

--Tim May, Occupied America "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759.

_________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail