Re: On The Inherent Evil of Electronic Democracy
Regarding the Electronic Democracy idea, I vote with Tim May. Look at the way public opinion is molded today through CNN, Tom Brokaw, Connie Chung, Oprah Winfrey, etc. One could even say that Clinton is the "Phil Donahue president" (he 'cares') - just look at the second candidate debate last fall.
I don't think public opinion is 'molded' so much, just that it's fancies are entertained too much. (Info-tained?) I dropped by a local bookstore last night to hear Jim Lehrer (McNeil/Lehrer Newhour on PBS) speak about his new book. He brought up this topic, saying that "mainstream news," (never mind the dribble of Donahue or Oprah) has been remiss in *reporting the news* for years, instead sensationalizing news and entertaining the masses. According to Lehrer, T.V. news (and newspapers who must now compete with them) have stopped asking their reporters to "get the facts" instead encouraging them to "get the dirt," or else. Look what has happened: the three major networks have lost over 30% market-share to other outlets like NPR and PBS or from people that just plain turn it off. Extreme voter apathy. Twentynothings from hell :-) The good side to this according to Lehrer is that one day soon a bunch of balding men will sit around the NBC board-room table and say, "We need more viewers, what do we do?" One particularly bright young man will finally say, "I know, let's report the news!," and everyone will bust out in applause. Lehrer's been doing it for 18 years. The info-tainment stuff is a small blip on the Neilson charts and nothing more. Maybe I'm a bit too optimistic for my own good though :^) - Jim
participants (1)
-
James Still