Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Order research
EE Times, Aug 9, 1993, p. 31 reports that "MIT's Research Lab of Electronics is creating new signal processor designs, based on chaos theory, that could open up a simple route to secure communications. The new designs use a recent discovery called synchronized chaos to transform a meaningful signal into what only seems to be random noise., A similarly constructed receiver responds to the noisy signal, sychronizing its own chaotic behaviour to extract the message. The MIT design requires only eight op-amps and is based on the Lorenz attractor, which generates a simple three-dimensional chaotic system." There's more, this is just a pointer. Their current encryption system is analog, not digital, and encrypts analog signals like audio; I don't know if this is a fundamental design property or not. They claim it's not super-great encryption, just cheap and interesting. Wired Sep/Oct 93 also reports (p.118) a Sep 9-12 conference on "Fluctuations and Order" at Los Alamos National Labs' Center for Nonlinear Studies. "The labs are gathering a couple dozen researchers who have realized they can induce order into systems by using noise and randomness. As one abstract says, `The addition of noise to certain types of driven systems can paradoxically cause a signal to become clearer.'" These seem related, to me. John
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- A recent _Scientific American_ had a brief piece on inducing order in chaotic systems; I don't have it handy, but apparently it's fairly simple to induce order in some nonlinear systems. I'm no chaotician, but it seems that if you want to synchronize two chaos generators at different sites, you must a) use the same initial values and b) use the same mechanism to induce order. Granted that small changes in a) or b) can change the system greatly, this doesn't seem all that different from conventional synchronized encryption systems. (I'm happy to note that much of this work is being done at Georgia Tech, my alma mater. It's great to be a fuzzy bee!) - -Paul - -- Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG | "Crypto-anarchy means never having to say perobich@ingr.com | you're sorry." - Tim May (tcmay@netcom.com) Intergraph Federal Systems | Be a cryptography user- ask me how. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCVAgUBLGk15SA78To+806NAQFLyQQAoZkg0VNeLCpfyqBtIDOsXcZQtBt0lo/Z gOSS8p1Q2hSYAaO6NgGAgZ3dsVBSaGVpoGxMoIGlzbjNbJ72BEIRxiz2Itt3ul/s DGbCIvqU8omph0msq8s2a3FBAnwE/yHfCbSHBPqmqRL29Bif7SpNh5qAc5JpEXBT IjrsgcVa83I= =4Mbz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This is how I see the situation: Neural Nets : Computers :: Chaotic analog encryption : DES The chaotic encryption work depends on a secret algorithm, no less. If you want a system which works, do it digitally. If you want to play and get papers accepted to the next hot-topic-of-the-day conference, go play with some op amps. If you want to play, there's an article in SciAm this month on building a chaotic "encryption" machine. It probably provides acceptable security if you use triple DES on signals prior to sending them.
participants (3)
-
gnu
-
paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com
-
Tom Knight