Any other US-based confirmation?
Friday, September 28 6:43 AM SGT
White House Will Not Support Push For National ID Card WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A., 2001 SEP 27 (NB) -- By Brian Krebs, Newsbytes. Bush
See wartimeliberty.com. -Declan On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 07:58:39PM -0700, citizenq@hushmail.com wrote:
Any other US-based confirmation?
Friday, September 28 6:43 AM SGT
White House Will Not Support Push For National ID Card WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A., 2001 SEP 27 (NB) -- By Brian Krebs, Newsbytes. Bush
Well this is quite encouraging. -Tolan. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/21916.html [Quote] "Anyone offended by the Orwellian implications of using face-recognition technology to scan airport crowds for terrorists can take heart in the fact that the technology is, quite simply, worthless in that situation. As an authentication tool, used in controlled settings, face recognition has real value. But even here we can expect a false acceptance rate (FAR) of one in 250, according to biometrics outfit FaceKey. " [snip] "'Limiting access to secure areas in airports would be a perfect application for biometrics,' Starkweather says. But in uncontrolled settings, such as we'd encounter in a surveillance context, the performance of face recognition falls to absurd depths. " [snip]
participants (3)
-
citizenqï¼ hushmail.com
-
Declan McCullagh
-
Tolan Blundell