Re: Responding to orders which include a secrecy requirement

1 Sep
2003
1 Sep
'03
12:26 p.m.
At 12:02 PM 8/31/03 -0700, Tim May wrote:
He said: "An ISP is free to say "anyone requesting a tap is required to
If you rent your house, and the renters cause you to get billed for something they do, you can certainly pass on the cost to the renter. If you get a ticket in a rented car, you (not the car owner) reimburse the owner. If your ISP gets a lot of complaints about your usage, they *could* pass on the cost to you. An ISP could regard its court-ordered hassles (or other hassles, eg attacks launched from your node) as your fault.
7917
Age (days ago)
7917
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Major Variola (ret)