David Wagner writes:
Given this risk, I've decided I cannot afford to continue to work in the area of copy protection as long as the uncertainty remains. And how in good conscience can I advise students working with me to work in this troubled area? I can't.
It's understandable that you would be concerned about the DMCA. Niels Ferguson raised the same issues when he decided not to publish. Why, then, did you go ahead with publication? This is the part which is hard to understand. Niels decided not to publish, you and your co-authors apparently came to the opposite conclusion. Rhetorically you are saying the same things as him, but your actions are different. It would be interesting to hear more about how you reconcile the decision to publish this result with the belief that the DMCA makes publication in this field too risky.
Anonymous wrote:
Why, then, did you go ahead with publication?
I believe publishing is important for the advancement of the field. If noone publishes, how will we learn from our mistakes? How will people learn of the risks? Fortunately, we are in a privileged position. The university has been supportive of our work, which has made it easier to publish on a limited basis despite the risks. However, if I knew when we started this project what I know now, I would not have initiated this research: I would have spent my time on some other important problem without the legal overhead and risks. In the future, you can bet that I won't be working on copy protection again, not if the situation stays like this.
participants (2)
-
Anonymous
-
daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu