...

Tyler Durden said:

...

Most people in this neck of the woods continue to believe that that flight that went down over Long Island a few years ago was actually shot down...many witnesses saw a rocket go up and hit the plane. The government, of course, denies it. God forbid the airlines collapse.

The CIA's official explanation of the event, even to this layman, is aerodynamically impossible. Let me say that the TWA 800 coverup has a lot to do with my cynicism about what really happened on 9/11. (I have a copy of the Howard Stern show from that day, and chopper reporter that Howard fed in clearly reports a second, massive explosion just before the south tower

collapsed. > Speaking with an ironworker who worked on the cleanup only brought more > questions as to the "real" cause of the collapses.) > > -Tim

Both of these these stories lack plausibility as far as I'm concerned. 1. For Flight 800: Why would a terrorist wait so long, and shoot at a plane at such an extreme altitude and range? It would have made a lot more sense to fire just after it got off the ground. Far less chance of a miss. 2. WTC: If you have the ability to insert tower-busting bombs into the WTC towers, why the hell would you go to the trouble of doing the plane thing? It tooks extra months/years, with high training costs, many extra people, and a substantial chance of failure or detection. For that matter, why the hell would you wait the better part of an hour before blowing the charge? Sometimes you just have to remember Occam's Razor. Terrorists may do evil things, but they are not usually that stupid. Peter Trei