At 06:16 PM 10/15/01 -0700, somebody with the password to tcmay@got.net wrote:
On Monday, October 15, 2001, at 06:07 PM, Luthor Blisset wrote:
Do you seriously think that justifies suspension of due process? If you don't, why did you bring it up? That aside, I think it's been sufficiently demonstrated that you shouldn't treat people like collateral damage unless you wish to receive similar consideration...
The Constitution applies at _all_ times. It is not something that is only for nice, calm situations.
The Bill of Rights does not say that the various parts of the Bill of Rights are suspendable when someone decides there is some reason to. This means the USA Bill, with its suspension of big chunks of the Fourth Amendment, is ipso facto unconstitutional.
You won't hear any disagreement from me, man. I was wondering if Anonymous was actually attempting to justify suspension of due process. Incedentally, I wonder if the USA Bill will get overturned by the Supreme Court anytime soon... Naaaa... Gr. -- Luthor //Remembering is copying and copying is THEFT