This is somewhat tacky. SecureDNS exists, and TIS got export approval a while back to publish a "bones" version, minus encryption routines. John Gilmore and his lawyer decided that, since it only does authentication, not message encryption, it should be ok to publish _with_ the crypto algorithms, and it's been quietly sitting on his web pages. Recently the Feds sent him a letter saying "Oh, no, we didn't mean it was OK to publish/export this encryption-based authentication system just because the law says you can, so stop it".... Now they're paying for another version. Are they going to try something DSS-based instead of RSA, just so you don't need encryption-capable crypto with it, or is this going to be another scam? Or is it just different parts of the Feds not talking to each other?
Delay is the deadliest form of denial. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Adobe Systems <mailto:mclow@mailhost2.csusm.edu> "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." --Thomas Jefferson