17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Lucky Green writes: : Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge, DigiCash's : Ecash is the only ecash that I am aware of. The other "ecashs" lack various : properties of cash, as previously explained by Bryce. This pretty well proves that ``ecash'' is a generic term--even though if it is correct the genus at the moment includes only one element--and thus that the trademark ``Ecash''--if that is what the trademark is--is awfully weak. -- Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH Internet: junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu