On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Bill Frantz wrote:
At 1:21 AM 9/18/96 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996 12:03:18 -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:
Gee, biotech has come a long way. Now I can download the Anthrax DNA sequence from the net and insert it in some carrier bacteria and start making Anthrax bacteria. Neat!
Culturing and growing anthrax is painfully simple. No DNA required.
Sorry Unicorn, you missed my point. (1) You need DNA to grow bacteria. You can get the DNA two ways. (A) You get a sample of the beast, or (B) You get a DNA sequence and then regenerate the DNA. (I don't think B is technically feasable yet.) (2) You can't send samples of the beast thru the net.
I think your point was that the net was not responsible for the proliferation of Anthrax development data. (Am I wrong?) My point was that in the eyes of the "leaders" all that is required to make the net responsible for the proliferation is for the process to be describeable in a simple one or two page set of instructions (such as Anthrax is).
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | "Cave softly, cave safely, | Periwinkle -- Consulting (408)356-8506 | and cave with duct tape." | 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz@netcom.com | - Marianne Russo | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
-- I hate lightning - finger for public key - Vote Monarchist unicorn@schloss.li