At 8:50 PM -0500 11/14/00, David Honig wrote:
At 01:40 PM 11/14/00 -0500, dmolnar wrote:
Nevada doesn't even require the stamp.
Damn, machine guns, no income tax *and* no stamp on absentee ballots. Gotta move there.
Believe me, I've looked into it. The absentee ballot thing is, as we've discussed, not an issue, as even California doesn't require the draconian stuff Declan was mentioning. As for machine guns, I personally don't care to own one--I appreciate the constitutional point, but I don't personally have a compelling desire to own one. I'm happy with semi-automatic FALs, HK91s, and AR-15s. So far, California has not tried to take mine away. If they try, I should have the several months of warning I need to move to Nevada or some other nominally free place. Income tax is a bigger issue. California collects about 9.5% from me, currently, but other states tend to make up for lower income tax by having higher property taxes and suchlike. Nevada doesn't, because of gambling. However, if the gambling business in Vegas and Reno suffers the way I expect it to, for various reasons beyond the scope of this piece, then I expect the large numbers of "blue collar workers" (hotel workers, casino workers, maids, restaurant workers, etc.) to vote for taxes on wealth of a kind that will make California look like a libertarian paradise. This is one major reason I'm not moving to Nevada. Another is that California basically staked out the claim on the Mediterranean climate in America! 1200 miles of coastline that has a classic Mediterranean weather and climate pattern: mild and rainy winters, sunny and mild the rest of the time. It would take a _lot_ for me to give this up to live in Montana, or Utah, or Texas. --Tim May -- (This .sig file has not been significantly changed since 1992. As the election debacle unfolds, it is time to prepare a new one. Stay tuned.)