Rich Graves <rcgraves@ix.netcom.com> writes:
Omegaman wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Yes, I understand this. It's quite obvious; being removed from the subscriber list hasn't slowed Vulis at all. When I was writing the piece Vulis seemed to have slowed his ad hominem attacks and instead was talkin about censorship (something that is within the charter of the list), but ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Actually, Declan, it's not. "info cypherpunks" in the body of a message to majordomo@toad.com yields the welcome message to the list -- the closest thing to a charter available. The subjects of censorship and free speech are neither mentioned nor alluded to anywhere within that document.
This is true.
Declan's "fight-censorship" list, though, is supposed to be about censorship, and he's allowing no criticism of his positions there.
He's exercising his property rights at the expense of his credibility. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps