On Saturday 19 April 2003 16:46, Harmon Seaver wrote:
(snip) Private property is purely a construct of Euro culture, at least in this hemisphere. Who owned the whole fucking continent when the eurotrash expatriates hit the east coast? You really think you *own* a piece of Mother Earth? Guess again when that volcano erupts underneath it.
The concept of, and respect for private property are essential elements of individual liberty. They cannot be separated. There is an inverse proportion between the power the governments have over private property and freedom.
Any individual who enforces, or any politician who votes for a law that uses force to regulate behavior is guilty of initiating force against anyone affected by the law (snip)
(snip) "using force to regulate behavior" is wrong? Like if some shithead tries to rob me I can't "regulate" their behavior? Or my village can't hire a professional "regulator" to deal with robbers? Or for that matter, to "regulate" people who smoke in public?
It is the initiation of force that is wrong. People who try to rob others should have their behavior regulated by being killed by their intended victims. Hiring professionals to deal with robbers is a valid response to the robbers' initiation of force. Killing people who use force to regulate individuals who smoke in public is also a legitimate response to the their initiation of force. David Neilson