Dimitri Vulis <dlv@bwalk.dm.com> writes:
Where do people get these bizarre ideas? C2 didn't censor the list. A guy who happened to work for C2 dropped some messages from one list. The messages still went out on the unfiltered list. Had he worked for Mc Donald's or the the NYC Sanitiation Department, would you blame them for this as well?
Lucky is lying: the censored articles were also filtered from the list which was billed as being unfiltered.
There were 3 lists: cypherpunks-unedited (everything) cypherpunks (moderated by Sandy) cypherpunks-flames (the stuff Sandy rejected) At the time I was subscribed to cypherpunks and cypherpunks-flames in the belief that this would result in getting everything, and save the bandwidth of subscribing to all 3, but allow me to tell what was rejected. I didn't see the censored post at all. This means at least that Sandy didn't post it to either of cypherpunks or cypherpunks-flames. This is consistent with his later admission that he considered Dimitri's comments on Stronghold security as a conflict of interests for him to post, as he was manually posting to both of those lists. Unfortunately I wasn't on cypherpunks-unedited at the time, but I thought that it was immediate send out from toad.com without going via Sandy. Adam -- Now officially an EAR violation... Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`