
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In <Pine.SUN.3.91.980826132122.4771A-100000@baker>, on 08/26/98 at 01:40 PM, Xcott Craver <caj@math.niu.edu> said:
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, William H. Geiger III wrote:
Yes but should this "standard" be enforced by law? Last time I looked there was no Constitutional right not to be offended.
Yet harassment is actionable. Nutty, huh? And it's just the tip of the iceberg: apparently the law protects you from being severely beaten, despite the fact that there is no explicit constitutional right not to be severely beaten.
Not trying to equate harassment with a severe beating, just pointing out that the lack of an explicit constitutional right does not magically nullify the rest of the law.
No, it does not, but unlike beating I *do* have a Constitutional right to be objectionable as I want with my speech. A good example is the Nazi march in Skokie,IL. The SC ruled that they had a right to march despite the fact that the large Jewish community there was quite offended by it.
strong Constitutional right to freedom of speech and the courts have long ruled that it is not just popular speech that is protected.
Indeed, "popular" speech is, almost by definition, the kind of speech that never really needs protection. That first amendment wouldn't have much of a purpose if it only protected popular stuff.
IMHO, this whole matter is an internal company matter. The courts and politicians should have no say in it.
It WAS an internal company matter, apparently, but the company didn't seem to do anything to remedy it. That's when you turn to law.
I see, so if a company and it's employees exercise their Constitutionally protect right of free speech and does not stop exercising that right when someone complains then the courts should take over? How does this match with your agreement that the 1st Amendment protects unpopular speech? - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- Tag-O-Matic: DOS=HIGH? I knew it was on something... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a-sha1 Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNeRfzI9Co1n+aLhhAQESSQP+JLyUGOJImWZ8OU9fp2/HpLS89NGmznFN tTdy/fVBOJxZzj+WVaNgy1fIYpgv/4VvLl+PWGDfH3ZpItTn+bj368vAQnv+UcVc ywHHDtLANyAHQqqioz733Zz7D5/KoZ98pei6lGsHzB4kie+3uqaCT4XoSx/LnUpg z8N0s4gKtXE= =JuvM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----