At 8:06 AM -0700 6/14/98, John Young wrote:
Not all Feds and phreakers agree that pedophobic Feds and teeny-cute phreaks help society, although the pedophilic Agency allegedly abusing the adorable phreaker for its come-on entrapment had "no comment" to its online childlove racketeering and profiteering, sort of like the NYT's art spiegel comic today.
I was scanning the dial on my shortwave radio recently and landed on Radio Havana. I was thinking about how in many countries (presumably including Cuba) it's a thought crime to tune in to banned broadcasts. And we in the West unctuously decry this. But are we all that different? Suppose "Radio Pedophilia" started broadcasting on 6223 KHz. Fill in the details on program content, etc. By any reading of the various child pornography laws in the U.S. merely _listening_ to such a broadcast would be a felony. Of this this there can be no doubt. Were such a station to exist (which it does not), I would expect FCC and FBI, with NSA SIGINT assistance, would use technical means to isolate who was tuned to this station and then bust in the doors. The only difference with the Sovs and Cubans and Berkeleyites would be the reasons the broadcasts were illegal to listen to. --Tim May "The tree of liberty must be watered periodically with the blood of tyrants...." ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.