But this is a well-established unsolvable problem in philosophy. It is impossible to examine your fundamental ideas for they are what you stand on to examine. What you think are basic are at least one step up from fundamental.
But you can cheat if there is a feedback. Suppose that an external party (as opposed to multiple personalities housed in the same wetware) diagnoses you with attribute A (eg. "you write in disconnected fashion and often mention "state") which you neither understand nor agree with. You then, blindly, do the opposite of A (~A) (write closely related sentences and never mention state). This is called acting and many can do it on regular basis. -- Damn, I must stop referring to Kubrick. ===== end (of original message) Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows: Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com