I glanced at it as well. I do not believe that the bill does what the Subject: line claims it does (unlawful labeling of music is terrorism). -Declan On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:34:04AM +0000, Justin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jim Choate (2003-05-20 23:52Z) wrote:
I suppose neither Mr. Rupp nor the Inquirer could be bothered to read the bill or the section of Oregon law referenced by it. Or perhaps reading a legislative summary was just too complicated or time-intensive for their busy schedules, and they decided to skip that formality in their quest to distribute their quota of truth to the public.
The provisions in Section 3 of the bill, currently in Section 19, Ch. 666 of Oregon Laws, are not related to the first part of the bill which seems to define terrorism.
- -- Freedom's untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things. They're also free to live their lives and do wonderful things. --Rumsfeld, 2003-04-11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj7LAbsACgkQnH0ZJUVoUkM0ZQCfXAgD1+HqG7cTTURFLx2gZWPF RQEAoL6x/2H7pTEgaIoZzEfqY71gvlvt =FidY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----