John Young wrote:
Peter Trei foolishly wrote:
The US airdrops replaced, at the very maximum, less then 2.5% of the food whose delivery was prevented by the bombing.
I'm reminded of the recent corporate ad from RJ Reynolds, where they made of deal of delivering some amount (less then 10 tons, I think) or aid to Kosovo. That amounted to a single truckload. They then spent many times the cost of the aid on airtime to trumpet their humanitarian efforts.
This is the kind of statement that deserves reporting among the 250,000 tips the FBI has received on its finger-a-terrorist website hotline.
Fucking traitors always disclose the classified bottom line math behind the body counts.
If a result of the bombing is to make humanitarian aid both easier and ultimately less necessary then it'll have been worth it. Not that that's the reason for it. jbdigriz