James Donald wrote:
At 09:25 AM 12/4/95 -0500, John Young wrote:
12-4-95. W$Jabber:
"Microsoft Probe Spurs Subpoenas Tied to Internet. Antitrust Effort Appears Focused on Windows 95 Disabled Rival Software."
The subpoena issued to Netscape may be of particular significance. In the estimate of Netscape and industry observers,
I regularly use netscape on windows 95, and I conclude that this subpoena is pure, 100% harassment.
What does that mean? I interpret it to mean only that Netscape is being asked to testify _against_ MS. I've been using Win95 along with at least half a dozen different browsers (including about the same number of different Netscape versions), and never had any compatibility problems switching. Most recently I was running IBM Explorer 2.0 until the other day when I "upgraded" to the latest beta of Navigator--at which point Explorer stopped being my default browser. Navigator never asked if I wanted to make it the default, but now all my .htm and .html files have that Navigator look. As soon as this project is done, I'm switching back to Explorer, thank you. -Pete Loshin pete@loshin.com