Could someone more versed in the law attempt to elaborate on the logic the judge is applying here? I mean, Pavlovich is a Purdue student with a Russian sounding name, so presumably he lives in Indiana. As I read it, the judge seems to feel that Californai law should apply to Pavlovich becasue Pavlovich KNOWS that lost of movies are made in Hollywood, and even that Hollywood happens to be in California. Now, I could understand the reasoning sort of if the judge had merely stated that any case where the plaintiff is californian should be tried in california, home team advantage and all that, but why should it matter that the defendent KNOWS that Hollywood is in California? I probably shouldn't admit this, but I happen to know that a lot of peanuts are grown in Senegal. Should I be worried? George