KING CHEST-BEATER said:
At 02:31 PM 4/1/01 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
Agree. I was just asking if there was any evidence that tech security licensing was the intent.
No, you also downplayed the perils of licensing, saying:
In the US private security consultants have numerous licenses, variable by state. ("C & G" licenses - guns, dogs, exec protect, PIs, etc.) Aren't ya'll just getting worked up over a misnomer?
Loaded/provocative questions get better answers. I bet you know that, hotshot.
I don't think that one or two posts is "getting worked up" over anything, and in any case I'll reserve final judgment until I read more.
I was referring to snips landing in my inbox on this issue, ..."which my original message did not say."
I'm most violently against any licensing scheme of the sort, and THIS ONE IN PARTICULAR. Ya'll keep dialing the wrong damn number with me. I'm starting
Which your original message did not say.
Declan, debating *peck!* with you is like...*peck!-peck!* death by *peck!* a dive-bombing Mockingbird. *peck!-peck!-peck!* Gets annoying, sometimes. *peck!-peck!-peck!* Really. *peck!* You just break the skin. *peck!* Come back as *peck!* something that bites. *peck!* It's cruel.
to get miffed about it. Go beat your chest somewhere else, Declan. :) :) Go take your men-are-beating-their-chests-and-I'm-a-woman-who-wants-civility comments elsewhere, Aimee. :)
Wrong number again. This time, you are dialing the wrong damn country code. Declan, curl up around my little finger... while there's still room. ~Aimee