On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 03:10 PM 09/23/2001 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
I think driving through my house qualifies as 'probable cause' to search his house IF there is evidence or a clear line of reasoning that it couldn't be done alone...
Well, of course. But the analogy here was comparing house keys to crypto,
Same damn thing. Your point is moot. Your comparison is thus...if I drive a car then I should have my house searched because I might(!) drive through your house. That isn't compatible with the 4th. That is what the crypto argument breaks down to. Not that I have done it or will do it. But that you can't search my house, irrespective of whether I did or didn't drive through yours; and you want to search my house. The point is to gain the opportunity for unrestrained entry to others property and activities. Explain how searching my house keeps me from still driving my car into yours? It doesn't. -- ____________________________________________________________________ Kill them all, take their land, and go there for vacation. Rage Against The Machine The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------