Laws create rights - argument in "is"
This is way too broad. The only "rights" laws can _create_ are the zero-sum rights of entitlement that impose a corresponding responsibility on others. Natural rights can't be created by fiat.
If you look at the original argument you will see that I'm explicitly denying the existence of Natural law. It has been recognised as a bankrupt philosophical position for at least two centuries. Its not even the basis for Libertarian argument which is principaly contractarian. The change in the wording of the declaration of Independence from "God Given" to "Self Evident" reflects the wider philosophical movement of the time. After Rousseau there was no need to depend on superstition as the foundation of ethics. If you argue from "natural law" you are simply parrotting the predjudices of society. It isn't philosophy, its more akin to the religious bigotry popular in the US South and Afghanistan. Phill