From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Information Security <guy@panix.com> wrote:
Let us know when you have an original thought.
Ad hominem often comes in handy...
You are too touchy to be on the Internet, leave now! ;-)
From: Missouri FreeNet Administration <sysadmin@mfn.org>
Obviously, as defenders of this man's right to post material offensive to Burnore, we too came under attack.
One man's attack is another's defense.
I'll have to remember that one. Some defense lawyers in Wyoming might want to use it in their clients' trial for their "defense" against that gay student.
You are equating speech to physical violence. Not a good way to defend anonymizers.
Now about Gary Burnore's "defense" against the underaged daughter of his girlfriend...
Like, why should cypherpunks care? You said it's not causing you a connectivity problem. You are boring everyone for no known reason.
The point here is that what little survives about this lunatic child molester (he has even successfully had his North Carolina Sex Offender record removed!),...
Gee, why don't you ask North Carolina why, in writing?
Irrelevant. The North Carolina website of registered sex offenders was only the vehicle by which the truth about Gary Burnore's existing conviction in California became known. Depublishing it in NC on some technicality...
What technicality?
which sentenced him to probation and required him to register as a sex offender.
I wonder if Pee Wee Herman had to register.
Perhaps the original whistleblower's e-mailed warnings led or contributed to Burnore's arrest, and to the resulting psychiatric treatment which may have protected future potential victims.
Just a bunch of nutters flaming each other endlessly. ---guy