-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Tue, 31 Dec 1996, snow wrote: [NON-Text Body part not included] That message said:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bill Frantz wrote:
All messages sent to the list must be encrypted with the list's
The Thorn wrote: public key.
So in order to post here, I hafta install and run PGP? Well, people were looking for the perfect formula to deny service to guys like me, and guess what? You found it! I will *not* install and run PGP.
Why not? There are acceptable email interfaces for just about every platform out there (pgp-elm, Eudora hooks, Private Idaho etc), and it really isn't _that_ much of a hassle to do.
It isn't enough to _write_ the code, or even to talk about it, you have to USE it as well.
Petro, Christopher C. petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff> snow@smoke.suba.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMsmcRPee0/pvOCipAQH0fQP/aUpiKWhsR5l7IYKOHQ0KbW6haFee0IYB PS191z1Mb/yVdqlbVCoQrqIAMCNTnWWMsLzwJDwczFrNcCO/Gn9T+jD3Vcv3D9Jx mkXLSGBJUXW4/JosUJWHHh3yJFL0dYFveGPkkM4LUpe9waVdAbhUcXX7zbleK+Fs mXMRLOqhHf4= =uAlw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I am using one of those email interfaces (premail + pine) and had trouble
reading your last message. I had to save the PGP attachement to a file.
To quote it, I had to read it in from a file. No big deal, and if I
changed software I could probably make it automatic. I suspect most
people on the list have yet to set up any software of this type. So if I,
already using such software, had a little trouble with one message, how
much trouble would others have? Then if the entire list were encrypted?
I suspect the list would lose a lot of subscribers.
- --------------------
Scott V. McGuire