14 Jan
2002
14 Jan
'02
11:30 p.m.
Petro wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 04:27 AM, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, ya?
Nonsense. No reasonable definition of criminal conduct would put the US government and al-Quaeda in the same category.
How about Criminal Conduct meaning "Actions violate the laws".
The USG *HAS* done that from time to time you know. Maybe not as baldly as al-Quaeda, but it has done so.
Okay, let's try a concrete example: A commits the offense of blocking another's driveway with his automobile. B commits murder. Is A in the same category as B? If yes, then I have to concede the argument, because as you say the US government is not Simon-pure. I do, however, make a distinction. Marc de Piolenc