On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Carskadden, Rush wrote:
It is possible for you to receive a freeze order that will compel you to maintain referenced records. These orders (generally received prior to a pending subpoena) can be rather general, so this generally serves the purpose of preventing you from going on a shred/rm/wipe/degauss spree before the authorities get what they want from you. However, I do know of at least one case where someone challenged such a document on the basis that it was obtuse. Can't cite off the top of my head, though. If you would like to see some copies of documents that are generally used by feds to accomplish these goals, let me know. I will see if I can neuter some for reference purposes.
ok,
Actually it's not. It completely misrepresents the initial statement that law in the US requires logs to be kept. It doesn't. A court may order it but that's another matter all together. ____________________________________________________________________ Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a smaller group must first understand it. "Stranger Suns" George Zebrowski The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------