On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:50:03PM -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
The New Yorker last week had an interesting article on this and also described the drone "pilots" as residing in the US.
I have seen multiple reports that they're operated from the US. Difficult to say inasmuch they're reliable. They do make sense from the logistics point of view.
However, there's something a little unclear here: Pure speed-of-light limitations would add, you'd think, unacceptable latency (a couple of seconds?).
Why should this be routed by GEO? This can be routed by LEO or via fiber. Arguably, this can be done mostly via regular Internet, with only the last leg of the journey through military platforms in the area.
Does this mean there's some kind of automatic lock-on that commits the drone to fire upon targets, or is there some kind of propaganda-typre reason why the
Of course they are smart ammunitions. This isn't a dogfight, where you would need local operators, or even reflexes built-in into UAVs.
gubmint would go out of it's way to make it appear that the operators are in the US?
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE