From: petro <petro@bounty.org>
The point is that you are *forcing* me to part with my productive labor to support someone else.
This makes me unhappy. Under your beliefs, you can't do this, as I have a right to be happy.
No dipshit, you have a right to TRY TO BE HAPPY.
You're the "dipshit" that can't track a conversation. If you could, you would have noticed that it wasn't *me* that was making the assertion that one has a right to "be happy", I was poking at the original poster for his asserting that happiness is an entitlement.
Typical anarcho/libertarian bullshit misprepresentation. And another prime example of 'freedom for me, but not for thee'.
This is a perfect example of the failure of libertarian/anarcho thought, it is completely focused on the 'me'.
When will you learn that free market economics is about the market and its stability and not the individuals attainment of nirvana. I'll answer my own question, never.
This would have a lot more weight if you could follow a converstation. -- A quote from Petro's Archives: ********************************************** "We forbid any course that says we restrict free speech." --Dr. Kathleen Dixon, Director of Women s Studies, Bowling Green State University