17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Frondeur writes:
Why do you believe the perjury case has `reasonable doubt' problems?
Watch TV and learn the answer. It's only perjury if it's material, and the judge said it wasn't material.
And the abuse of power case seems thin even to a non-lawyer. But where does the `executive privilege stuff' come in? I don't see that Starr listed that among his possible grounds for impeachment.
Among the grounds Starr listed was Clinton's attempt to delay the investigation by raising many legal objections. He claimed privilege, for example, with respect to Secret Service testimony. Most of his efforts were ultimately overruled.