On 12 Feb 1997, Against Moderation wrote:
Date: 12 Feb 1997 16:51:37 -0000 From: Against Moderation <antimod@nym.alias.net> To: aga <aga@dhp.com> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com, cypherpunks@pgh.org, InterNet Freedom Council <ifc@pgh.org>, ichudov@algebra.com, dlv@bwalk.dm.com, Freedom Knights <freedom-knights@jetcafe.org> Subject: Re: Moderation experiment almost over; "put up or shut up"
aga <aga@dhp.com> writes:
Yes, and just why is Gilmore such a jerk? Could his homosexuality have anything to do with it?
Doubtful. Given the fact that gay people suffer a great deal of discrimination, they generally tend to be fairly open-minded. I see no reason to believe Gilmore is in fact gay, but if he is it in no way affects my opinion of him.
Well, the fact remains that the homos are instrumental in creating and forming a cliquish and censored usenet. There is just no question about that. Remember the previous cypherpunk who stated that the gays "created and run usenet."
Maybe they just wanted you to leave, Gilmore. After all, your EFF has ruined the reputation of the InterNet, and your homosexuality is a bad sign. Homos should not be allowed to have any authority positions anyplace on the net.
Your bigotry seriously undermines the effectiveness of any anti-censorship arguments you make.
Your assumption that I am a "bigot" makes it you appear uninformed. Sexism is good, but racism is bad. A sexist is not a bigot. The only one who qualifies as a "bigot" is a racist.
Are you just trying to get everyone to hate those who oppose censorship on cypherpunks. Which side are you on anyway?
It is very logical and wise to discriminate on the basis of sex. I am not a racist, so therefore I can not be a "bigot," regardless of my views on homosexuality.